<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Can We Expect from ECM Analysts?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordofpie.com/2009/12/02/what-can-we-expect-from-ecm-analysts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordofpie.com/2009/12/02/what-can-we-expect-from-ecm-analysts/</link>
	<description>Ponderings on Life, the Universe, and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Thrasher</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2009/12/02/what-can-we-expect-from-ecm-analysts/#comment-11234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dean Thrasher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/what-can-we-expect-from-ecm-analysts/#comment-11234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post, Pie!

Like you, I think much of the criticism of analysts has been undeserved. Firms like Gartner and Forrester are providing useful data in a concise form. 

But I do think the reports suffer from a systemic bias toward the vendors&#039; point of view, rather than the customers&#039; perspective. This is the root cause of the reports evaluating products rather than full-fledged solutions.

The bias is probably unintentional. Vendors have a vested interest in wooing analysts, so it&#039;s far easier for these market research firms to do a vendor roundup than it is to do original research into the success or failure of specific company initiatives.

As you point out, it&#039;s how these tools operate in real-world conditions at actual customer sites that matter, not whether a particular software company has a bigger market share or more visionary whitepapers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Pie!</p>
<p>Like you, I think much of the criticism of analysts has been undeserved. Firms like Gartner and Forrester are providing useful data in a concise form. </p>
<p>But I do think the reports suffer from a systemic bias toward the vendors&#8217; point of view, rather than the customers&#8217; perspective. This is the root cause of the reports evaluating products rather than full-fledged solutions.</p>
<p>The bias is probably unintentional. Vendors have a vested interest in wooing analysts, so it&#8217;s far easier for these market research firms to do a vendor roundup than it is to do original research into the success or failure of specific company initiatives.</p>
<p>As you point out, it&#8217;s how these tools operate in real-world conditions at actual customer sites that matter, not whether a particular software company has a bigger market share or more visionary whitepapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

