<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Content Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordofpie.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordofpie.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/</link>
	<description>Ponderings on Life, the Universe, and Documentum</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:14:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Looking Beyond Box&#8217;s Market-Speak &#171; Word of Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-12397</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking Beyond Box&#8217;s Market-Speak &#171; Word of Pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-12397</guid>
		<description>[...] to deliver and have a direction.&#160; They have a good vision.&#160; They are trying to achieve Omnipresent Content Management now.&#160; They are starting down that road towards realization of that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to deliver and have a direction.&#160; They have a good vision.&#160; They are trying to achieve Omnipresent Content Management now.&#160; They are starting down that road towards realization of that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-9796</link>
		<dc:creator>Pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-9796</guid>
		<description>Ashish, the ECM vendors, on average, aren&#039;t looking at this issue. Many organizations aren&#039;t prioritizing it yet.  It has been done, but I have only heard of custom efforts and proprietary solutions.  We need an open approach, like maybe SAML and XACML.

While I don&#039;t think the tech is that far off, I do think that the culture shift that will be required to make everyone ready to implement it is far off. This issue gets a lot of talk, but very little action.  It will change one day, but it is not going to happen tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashish, the ECM vendors, on average, aren&#8217;t looking at this issue. Many organizations aren&#8217;t prioritizing it yet.  It has been done, but I have only heard of custom efforts and proprietary solutions.  We need an open approach, like maybe SAML and XACML.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t think the tech is that far off, I do think that the culture shift that will be required to make everyone ready to implement it is far off. This issue gets a lot of talk, but very little action.  It will change one day, but it is not going to happen tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish Srivastava</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-9309</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish Srivastava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-9309</guid>
		<description>Nicely defined ECM future :-)

It is not that far though ...

Do we have some good case studies on the implementation of integration of ECM systems with Identity and Access Management?

Some organizations are already looking at this aspect. We might need one service layer here also to make this integration vendor neutral for people and applications using multiple IDM and Access Management systems.

Would love to hear your thoughts on this

Kind Regards,
Ashish Srivastava</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely defined ECM future <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It is not that far though &#8230;</p>
<p>Do we have some good case studies on the implementation of integration of ECM systems with Identity and Access Management?</p>
<p>Some organizations are already looking at this aspect. We might need one service layer here also to make this integration vendor neutral for people and applications using multiple IDM and Access Management systems.</p>
<p>Would love to hear your thoughts on this</p>
<p>Kind Regards,<br />
Ashish Srivastava</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiv</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-8839</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-8839</guid>
		<description>This article is simply superb..every bit of it is worth reading....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is simply superb..every bit of it is worth reading&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ukdavo</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-6877</link>
		<dc:creator>ukdavo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-6877</guid>
		<description>I like the term Omnipresent Content Management. Hopefully, this vision of OCM will mean we can access content from anywhere using a variety of access points (all thin clients of course). e.g. Check into a hotel, switch on the TV and you can see your personal content there - e.g. formal docs, emails, phone audio/visual messages, music/videos you own/lease, etc.

Your point about having the technological capability and problems with trusting online storage is spot on. I would also suggest that software vendors and service providers will find it very difficult to agree on content formats and APIs to make this work - they will all want to own this! Sorry for sounding pessimistic but we still haven&#039;t solved the problem of a standard office document format, standard messaging protocol, standard social networking API, web standards that actually work (CSS/HTML), a single Java web framework that everyone agrees doesn&#039;t suck, world hunger, etc yet we have the means to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the term Omnipresent Content Management. Hopefully, this vision of OCM will mean we can access content from anywhere using a variety of access points (all thin clients of course). e.g. Check into a hotel, switch on the TV and you can see your personal content there &#8211; e.g. formal docs, emails, phone audio/visual messages, music/videos you own/lease, etc.</p>
<p>Your point about having the technological capability and problems with trusting online storage is spot on. I would also suggest that software vendors and service providers will find it very difficult to agree on content formats and APIs to make this work &#8211; they will all want to own this! Sorry for sounding pessimistic but we still haven&#8217;t solved the problem of a standard office document format, standard messaging protocol, standard social networking API, web standards that actually work (CSS/HTML), a single Java web framework that everyone agrees doesn&#8217;t suck, world hunger, etc yet we have the means to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-6708</link>
		<dc:creator>Pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-6708</guid>
		<description>Google is working on a start, but feature-wise, they are lacking.  Reliability is also an option.  On the other hand, Google docs are free, so you get what you pay for on that front.  I also find the security model on Google Docs to be a pain, but that is just my experience.

We are a long way off, not because of the technology.  I figure that will be solved in the next 5 years at the outside.  It is the mindset of everyone to accept the technology and to trust in it.  Trust is a key factor in realizing this future.  The Identity Management aspect of it is critical, not from a functional perspective, but in establishing the foundation of trust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is working on a start, but feature-wise, they are lacking.  Reliability is also an option.  On the other hand, Google docs are free, so you get what you pay for on that front.  I also find the security model on Google Docs to be a pain, but that is just my experience.</p>
<p>We are a long way off, not because of the technology.  I figure that will be solved in the next 5 years at the outside.  It is the mindset of everyone to accept the technology and to trust in it.  Trust is a key factor in realizing this future.  The Identity Management aspect of it is critical, not from a functional perspective, but in establishing the foundation of trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Michaelson</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-6514</link>
		<dc:creator>George Michaelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-6514</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this article, Pie.

The future is not that far (the content management aspect of it) though. Isn&#039;t it what Google is doing at several fronts ? Like Google docs for example?
You example clearly demonstrates - it is &quot;universal&quot; Identity &amp; Access Management that represents a BIG challenge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this article, Pie.</p>
<p>The future is not that far (the content management aspect of it) though. Isn&#8217;t it what Google is doing at several fronts ? Like Google docs for example?<br />
You example clearly demonstrates &#8211; it is &#8220;universal&#8221; Identity &amp; Access Management that represents a BIG challenge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nilson</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-6040</link>
		<dc:creator>nilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-6040</guid>
		<description>Man,
you could be the writer of star trek or star war.
Nice thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man,<br />
you could be the writer of star trek or star war.<br />
Nice thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-5997</link>
		<dc:creator>Pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 02:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-5997</guid>
		<description>Simple answer, expectations.  You can&#039;t deploy ECM in a month or a year.  It isn&#039;t a project, it is a program.  Clients don&#039;t all fully understand this and the number of people that have successfully implemented an ECM program is small.

This future is not near-term. ECM as a rule vs. the exception is years away.

-Pie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple answer, expectations.  You can&#8217;t deploy ECM in a month or a year.  It isn&#8217;t a project, it is a program.  Clients don&#8217;t all fully understand this and the number of people that have successfully implemented an ECM program is small.</p>
<p>This future is not near-term. ECM as a rule vs. the exception is years away.</p>
<p>-Pie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoxPRO</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-5996</link>
		<dc:creator>DoxPRO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/the-future-of-content-management/#comment-5996</guid>
		<description>Wow ...... great article and nice thoughts

This sound like a great future is waiting all of us or maybe Pie in the sky  :) . The fact remains that  your starting point ….. can we define ECM?   

we have been dreaming about the ECM utopia for so long while the gap between the technologists dreams (ECMrs) and our clients basic requirements keeps growing. The industry track records in helping these clients is dismal at best, the most successful projects still are the basic bread and butter implementations same as what was done using Wang or Filenet many years back.

Why the ECM industry has this adoption gap between research and implementation?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8230;&#8230; great article and nice thoughts</p>
<p>This sound like a great future is waiting all of us or maybe Pie in the sky  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  . The fact remains that  your starting point ….. can we define ECM?   </p>
<p>we have been dreaming about the ECM utopia for so long while the gap between the technologists dreams (ECMrs) and our clients basic requirements keeps growing. The industry track records in helping these clients is dismal at best, the most successful projects still are the basic bread and butter implementations same as what was done using Wang or Filenet many years back.</p>
<p>Why the ECM industry has this adoption gap between research and implementation?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
