<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on EMC World 2008 and the ECM Professional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordofpie.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordofpie.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/</link>
	<description>Ponderings on Life, the Universe, and Documentum</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3282</link>
		<dc:creator>Pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3282</guid>
		<description>Thanks.  I actually read that a while back.  I disagree on some points with Alan, though he has an outsiders perspective.

-Pie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  I actually read that a while back.  I disagree on some points with Alan, though he has an outsiders perspective.</p>
<p>-Pie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssk_star</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>ssk_star</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>thanks for the details review. Just wanted to share another article that I&#039;ve read in CMS watch, it will give you some answers for some of the questions...
http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/179-EMC-World-2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the details review. Just wanted to share another article that I&#8217;ve read in CMS watch, it will give you some answers for some of the questions&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/179-EMC-World-2008" rel="nofollow">http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/179-EMC-World-2008</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3182</link>
		<dc:creator>Pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 21:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3182</guid>
		<description>Brian, thank you for chiming-in.  I think the numbers from previous conferences did not include the EMC/Documentum employees, but you have access to better numbers there.

The discrepancy with the business users may be tied to being unable to find those in the CMA community.  With less Case Study presentations this year, there are less sessions that they are likely to stay after to ask questions offline.  That makes them harder to identify.  I would like to state that many people have made this observation to me and that it isn&#039;t just my own observation.

The party was a start, but it was poorly advertised as a CMA event as opposed to a Crown Partners event. Many people felt that they had to spend time at the Crown booth in order to get an invite.  Most people did not perceive it as being CMA inclusive, so by default, it wasn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, thank you for chiming-in.  I think the numbers from previous conferences did not include the EMC/Documentum employees, but you have access to better numbers there.</p>
<p>The discrepancy with the business users may be tied to being unable to find those in the CMA community.  With less Case Study presentations this year, there are less sessions that they are likely to stay after to ask questions offline.  That makes them harder to identify.  I would like to state that many people have made this observation to me and that it isn&#8217;t just my own observation.</p>
<p>The party was a start, but it was poorly advertised as a CMA event as opposed to a Crown Partners event. Many people felt that they had to spend time at the Crown booth in order to get an invite.  Most people did not perceive it as being CMA inclusive, so by default, it wasn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Fitzgerald</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3181</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Fitzgerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 20:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3181</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to blog from EMC World. One thing I think is worth commenting on is the accounting for the number of Content Management/Momentum attendees. The number of 1500+ used at EMC World is a figure representing only the customers and selected partners.  When you add the EMC emplooyees focused on content management, EMC executives and others who attended the conference (and who would have if it were a stand-alone content mangement event) you would be back well over 2000 people. In fact, as part of the EMC World team,  we have watched the content management component of the conference (both partner and customer) to ensure that it has, in fact, held steady or grown year over year.

The same holds true for non-technical attendees; the proportion of the EMC World audience that fits a line-of-business or CxO type of role continues to increase year over year, and we are adding more content for that non-technical content every year.

You are dead-on in terms of the importance of that sense of community, and we also take steps to build and ensure that sense of community and networking for all attendees. The community model, color-coded tags, and special events like the CMA/Momentum party all tie to that goal.

We will continue to take all input and suggestions into our thinking for next year (and the years after that). Our goal is a vibrant community for the content management audience and we&#039;re excited to make that happen at EMC World (and beyond).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to blog from EMC World. One thing I think is worth commenting on is the accounting for the number of Content Management/Momentum attendees. The number of 1500+ used at EMC World is a figure representing only the customers and selected partners.  When you add the EMC emplooyees focused on content management, EMC executives and others who attended the conference (and who would have if it were a stand-alone content mangement event) you would be back well over 2000 people. In fact, as part of the EMC World team,  we have watched the content management component of the conference (both partner and customer) to ensure that it has, in fact, held steady or grown year over year.</p>
<p>The same holds true for non-technical attendees; the proportion of the EMC World audience that fits a line-of-business or CxO type of role continues to increase year over year, and we are adding more content for that non-technical content every year.</p>
<p>You are dead-on in terms of the importance of that sense of community, and we also take steps to build and ensure that sense of community and networking for all attendees. The community model, color-coded tags, and special events like the CMA/Momentum party all tie to that goal.</p>
<p>We will continue to take all input and suggestions into our thinking for next year (and the years after that). Our goal is a vibrant community for the content management audience and we&#8217;re excited to make that happen at EMC World (and beyond).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3165</link>
		<dc:creator>Pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3165</guid>
		<description>Thanks Lisa.  I think that is a good goal.  Let&#039;s shoot for over 50% next year and 100% in 2.

Posting this in an upcoming post, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alexandra.st/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alexandra Larsson&lt;/a&gt; took some notes as well on other sessions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lisa.  I think that is a good goal.  Let&#8217;s shoot for over 50% next year and 100% in 2.</p>
<p>Posting this in an upcoming post, but <a href="http://www.alexandra.st/" rel="nofollow">Alexandra Larsson</a> took some notes as well on other sessions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3164</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa McIntyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3164</guid>
		<description>Laurence, I too would like to thank you for the excellent coverage you have both of EMC World and of the ECM world.
With you blogging the conference, I felt as if we had an extra person on our team (of two) attending the conference.  You seemed to get to the sessions we wanted to get to, but for lack of sheer numbers, couldn&#039;t.
Here&#039;s to a goal of next year of having enough people blogging the conference to have close to 100% coverage of all of the Momentum/ECM sessions (okay, maybe we start at 50%, with 100% within the next 3 years).  
Thanks again for all the comments and hard work.

Lisa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurence, I too would like to thank you for the excellent coverage you have both of EMC World and of the ECM world.<br />
With you blogging the conference, I felt as if we had an extra person on our team (of two) attending the conference.  You seemed to get to the sessions we wanted to get to, but for lack of sheer numbers, couldn&#8217;t.<br />
Here&#8217;s to a goal of next year of having enough people blogging the conference to have close to 100% coverage of all of the Momentum/ECM sessions (okay, maybe we start at 50%, with 100% within the next 3 years).<br />
Thanks again for all the comments and hard work.</p>
<p>Lisa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3160</link>
		<dc:creator>Pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3160</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your thoughts, both of you.  I&#039;m glad that you found the posts, and my thoughts, useful.  More are on the way.

Chuck, I was looking for you and now I know why I didn&#039;t find you.

Marko, next year is year three.  I have hopes that it will be better, even if we have to counter-program.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your thoughts, both of you.  I&#8217;m glad that you found the posts, and my thoughts, useful.  More are on the way.</p>
<p>Chuck, I was looking for you and now I know why I didn&#8217;t find you.</p>
<p>Marko, next year is year three.  I have hopes that it will be better, even if we have to counter-program.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msillanp</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3156</link>
		<dc:creator>msillanp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 11:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3156</guid>
		<description>I couldn’t quite put my finger on it but Laurence you nailed it though Billy C! said it best, “Nerds!”  Think about it.  

As a species, we nerds, are non-social animals.  We’re relegated to our dark cold hidden corridors of the office building rarely venturing out only to scatter when place into the light.  But the internet bubble created a new species of nerds, cool nerds.  Practitioners of content management are artists and nerds.  Maybe what we’re seeing at EMC World, a culture class.  

What you pointed out so well is we’re missing the time face-to-face collaboration.  I can sit on a webinar and be talked too but at this great annual opportunity, we’re missing the time to collaborate with peers, vendors, and our software provider all interested in moving content management.  What we’re interested in is learning with others not just from others.  How you would configure a server for a pharmaceutical company is probably the same as you configure it for an airline but how you would deploy content management is completely different.  You only learn the other through collaboration with peers.

Momentum was, and in Europe still is, about the meeting of business and IT not to create content for an organization but to create value for the organization.  And in the professional world isn’t that what it’s really about, creating value?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn’t quite put my finger on it but Laurence you nailed it though Billy C! said it best, “Nerds!”  Think about it.  </p>
<p>As a species, we nerds, are non-social animals.  We’re relegated to our dark cold hidden corridors of the office building rarely venturing out only to scatter when place into the light.  But the internet bubble created a new species of nerds, cool nerds.  Practitioners of content management are artists and nerds.  Maybe what we’re seeing at EMC World, a culture class.  </p>
<p>What you pointed out so well is we’re missing the time face-to-face collaboration.  I can sit on a webinar and be talked too but at this great annual opportunity, we’re missing the time to collaborate with peers, vendors, and our software provider all interested in moving content management.  What we’re interested in is learning with others not just from others.  How you would configure a server for a pharmaceutical company is probably the same as you configure it for an airline but how you would deploy content management is completely different.  You only learn the other through collaboration with peers.</p>
<p>Momentum was, and in Europe still is, about the meeting of business and IT not to create content for an organization but to create value for the organization.  And in the professional world isn’t that what it’s really about, creating value?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Hollis</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3155</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Hollis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 03:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/thoughts-on-emc-world-2008-and-the-ecm-professional/#comment-3155</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t thank you enough for your postings throughout EMC World.  

Not only did you do an extreme service to the Documentum community, I personally enjoyed learning from your recounting of the sessions, both qualitatively and quantitatively.

I wasn&#039;t able to attend (insert long complex reasons why here), but -- written through your eyes -- I received a unique perspective that I found valuable and insightful.

Your comments about the need for increased engagement in the Documentum and the broader ECM community are well stated.  FWIW, I will do everything I can to help lobby for increased focus on this vibrant -- and increasingly relevant -- community.

Thanks ever so much for your efforts!  

You rock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t thank you enough for your postings throughout EMC World.  </p>
<p>Not only did you do an extreme service to the Documentum community, I personally enjoyed learning from your recounting of the sessions, both qualitatively and quantitatively.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t able to attend (insert long complex reasons why here), but &#8212; written through your eyes &#8212; I received a unique perspective that I found valuable and insightful.</p>
<p>Your comments about the need for increased engagement in the Documentum and the broader ECM community are well stated.  FWIW, I will do everything I can to help lobby for increased focus on this vibrant &#8212; and increasingly relevant &#8212; community.</p>
<p>Thanks ever so much for your efforts!  </p>
<p>You rock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
