<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Measuring ECM Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordofpie.com/2008/01/14/measuring-ecm-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordofpie.com/2008/01/14/measuring-ecm-performance/</link>
	<description>Ponderings on Life, the Universe, and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:39:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lopataru</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2008/01/14/measuring-ecm-performance/#comment-2837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lopataru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/measuring-ecm-performance/#comment-2837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking of ECM I think performance is indicated mainly by:
1. user experience (ui+speed+relevance)
2. reliability
3. scalability
My experience showed me that pure data manipulation performance means a lot of read queries and some small number of updates. Even in transactional CM.
I fully agree that current top ECMs are burdened with legacies and/or mixture of overlapping products.
I&#039;ll love to see the evolution of startups.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of ECM I think performance is indicated mainly by:<br />
1. user experience (ui+speed+relevance)<br />
2. reliability<br />
3. scalability<br />
My experience showed me that pure data manipulation performance means a lot of read queries and some small number of updates. Even in transactional CM.<br />
I fully agree that current top ECMs are burdened with legacies and/or mixture of overlapping products.<br />
I&#8217;ll love to see the evolution of startups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

