<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Define ECM 2.0, Not the Clock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordofpie.com/2007/10/30/we-define-ecm-20-not-the-clock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/10/30/we-define-ecm-20-not-the-clock/</link>
	<description>Ponderings on Life, the Universe, and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:39:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/10/30/we-define-ecm-20-not-the-clock/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/we-define-ecm-20-not-the-clock/#comment-1080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As ever a thoughtful post !

I guess I was feeling quite cynical. I am a big proponent of &#039;content centric collaboration&#039; and much of the &#039;enterprise 2.0&#039; stuff (and its source i.e. web 2.0 stuff) is about collaboration, so is sticking eRoom Enterprise ontop of Documentum Content Server already ECM 2.0 ?? Well not unless eRoom gets an AJAX makeover ..... just joking Laurence :-)

I know the whole standards based, SOA approach is not your personal dream, its mine too, and that of everyone else in this corner of the industry, but like I said I had my cynical head on. Ultimately your right, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, its just labels and it does not really matter. Its about useful, useable information management.

p.s. love the &#039;son 2.0&#039; :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As ever a thoughtful post !</p>
<p>I guess I was feeling quite cynical. I am a big proponent of &#8216;content centric collaboration&#8217; and much of the &#8216;enterprise 2.0&#8242; stuff (and its source i.e. web 2.0 stuff) is about collaboration, so is sticking eRoom Enterprise ontop of Documentum Content Server already ECM 2.0 ?? Well not unless eRoom gets an AJAX makeover &#8230;.. just joking Laurence <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I know the whole standards based, SOA approach is not your personal dream, its mine too, and that of everyone else in this corner of the industry, but like I said I had my cynical head on. Ultimately your right, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, its just labels and it does not really matter. Its about useful, useable information management.</p>
<p>p.s. love the &#8216;son 2.0&#8242; <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

