<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ECM Standards for SOA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordofpie.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/</link>
	<description>Ponderings on Life, the Universe, and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/#comment-2940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/#comment-2940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iECM is still moving forward.  I&#039;m actually a participant and I&#039;ll be sharing some about it in the near future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iECM is still moving forward.  I&#8217;m actually a participant and I&#8217;ll be sharing some about it in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orcmid</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/#comment-2939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[orcmid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/#comment-2939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also just noticed that iECM seems to have fallen off the radar.  Sometime last year I heard that it might be fading away.

Meanwhile, I am roadmapping future ODMA work at
http://orcmid.com/BlunderDome/clueless/2008/02/dmware-odma-futures-roadmap.asp

It&#039;s still fat-client centric.  

By the way, I thought WebDAV versioning (DeltaV) had been approved.   I&#039;ve lost track of the Authentication (ACL) part though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also just noticed that iECM seems to have fallen off the radar.  Sometime last year I heard that it might be fading away.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I am roadmapping future ODMA work at<br />
<a href="http://orcmid.com/BlunderDome/clueless/2008/02/dmware-odma-futures-roadmap.asp" rel="nofollow">http://orcmid.com/BlunderDome/clueless/2008/02/dmware-odma-futures-roadmap.asp</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s still fat-client centric.  </p>
<p>By the way, I thought WebDAV versioning (DeltaV) had been approved.   I&#8217;ve lost track of the Authentication (ACL) part though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/#comment-1940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/#comment-1940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Orcmid, not something I will probably work with, but I&#039;m posted your comments for others that may be interested.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orcmid, not something I will probably work with, but I&#8217;m posted your comments for others that may be interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orcmid</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[orcmid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/#comment-1682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Laurence, your mention of the ODMA sweet spot is interesting.   I&#039;m looking around to see if there is any interest in preserving that with a cleanup for ODMA64 in the 64-bit world.  I have a post about it here:
http://orcmid.com/BlunderDome/clueless/2007/11/dmware-how-about-that-odma64.asp

I&#039;m hoping to arrange a huddle about this at AIIM 2008 next March in Boston.  I will also be posting more on the status of ODMA and some activities to tighten up ODMA32.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Laurence, your mention of the ODMA sweet spot is interesting.   I&#8217;m looking around to see if there is any interest in preserving that with a cleanup for ODMA64 in the 64-bit world.  I have a post about it here:<br />
<a href="http://orcmid.com/BlunderDome/clueless/2007/11/dmware-how-about-that-odma64.asp" rel="nofollow">http://orcmid.com/BlunderDome/clueless/2007/11/dmware-how-about-that-odma64.asp</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping to arrange a huddle about this at AIIM 2008 next March in Boston.  I will also be posting more on the status of ODMA and some activities to tighten up ODMA32.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/#comment-1144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bex.  I&#039;m right there with you on Extensibility.  I will have to look at JSON.  I haven&#039;t made any decision on what technology backbone to prefer at this point.  REST is trailing, but not out yet.

I have more to learn still and I appreciate your inputs.

As for iECM, I&#039;ll have a post on that soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bex.  I&#8217;m right there with you on Extensibility.  I will have to look at JSON.  I haven&#8217;t made any decision on what technology backbone to prefer at this point.  REST is trailing, but not out yet.</p>
<p>I have more to learn still and I appreciate your inputs.</p>
<p>As for iECM, I&#8217;ll have a post on that soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bex</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/#comment-1143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[looks like iECM got gobbled up by AIIM... I&#039;m concerned that there&#039;s no more public wiki.

IMHO, &lt;b&gt;Extensibility is the key&lt;/b&gt; in an ECM standard. That&#039;s why I prefer a loose, data-driven, JSON-based web service protocol.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like iECM got gobbled up by AIIM&#8230; I&#8217;m concerned that there&#8217;s no more public wiki.</p>
<p>IMHO, <b>Extensibility is the key</b> in an ECM standard. That&#8217;s why I prefer a loose, data-driven, JSON-based web service protocol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/ecm-standards-for-soa/#comment-993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laurence, last time you and I met at the Momentum part of EMC World back in May, I asked many EMC people why they were not supporting JSR170 and its successor. The answer was, that they were concentrating on iECM instead.

As a member of AIIM, I would like iECM to be your (actualy &#039;our&#039;) panacea, but where is it ? It appears to have gone very quiet ! Lets keep our fingers crossed that in the end something (very) good will come out of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurence, last time you and I met at the Momentum part of EMC World back in May, I asked many EMC people why they were not supporting JSR170 and its successor. The answer was, that they were concentrating on iECM instead.</p>
<p>As a member of AIIM, I would like iECM to be your (actualy &#8216;our&#8217;) panacea, but where is it ? It appears to have gone very quiet ! Lets keep our fingers crossed that in the end something (very) good will come out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

