<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taxonomies, Good, Bad, or Ugly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordofpie.com/2007/08/13/taxonomies-good-bad-or-ugly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/08/13/taxonomies-good-bad-or-ugly/</link>
	<description>Ponderings on Life, the Universe, and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Folders, A Nutritious Part of Your Content Management Diet &#171; Word of Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/08/13/taxonomies-good-bad-or-ugly/#comment-34090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Folders, A Nutritious Part of Your Content Management Diet &#171; Word of Pie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/08/13/taxonomies-good-bad-or-ugly/#comment-34090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A related post that I wrote years ago on this topic still applies if you are interested in reading more: Taxonomies, Good, Bad, or Ugly? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A related post that I wrote years ago on this topic still applies if you are interested in reading more: Taxonomies, Good, Bad, or Ugly? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/08/13/taxonomies-good-bad-or-ugly/#comment-3758</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/08/13/taxonomies-good-bad-or-ugly/#comment-3758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have trouble finding it myself. I learned it a long time ago and when I saw it in the cited article, it wasn&#039;t new information.  The article does not cite it&#039;s source for it, so I&#039;m at a dead-end.

It roughly equates to 8-13 per folder per level.  My revised formula is 9-16 items per level.  There is a lot of averaging here as some will fall under that range and others will fall above.  The average works out usually.

So if it isn&#039;t widely-used and I was incorrect, then maybe it should be widely-used.  :)

-Pie]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have trouble finding it myself. I learned it a long time ago and when I saw it in the cited article, it wasn&#8217;t new information.  The article does not cite it&#8217;s source for it, so I&#8217;m at a dead-end.</p>
<p>It roughly equates to 8-13 per folder per level.  My revised formula is 9-16 items per level.  There is a lot of averaging here as some will fall under that range and others will fall above.  The average works out usually.</p>
<p>So if it isn&#8217;t widely-used and I was incorrect, then maybe it should be widely-used.  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-Pie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Boeri</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/08/13/taxonomies-good-bad-or-ugly/#comment-3757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Boeri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/08/13/taxonomies-good-bad-or-ugly/#comment-3757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really like your &quot;rule of thumb&quot; about folder depth -- log base 10 of the number of documents. It feels right, and I believe applies to hierarchical structures besides folders -- facets in search, site navigation, ...

However, here is my question: Where did you find this &quot;widely used&quot; rule of thumb? I&#039;ve looked all over and can&#039;t find the source (or other users of this rule). 

Thanks! -Bob]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like your &#8220;rule of thumb&#8221; about folder depth &#8212; log base 10 of the number of documents. It feels right, and I believe applies to hierarchical structures besides folders &#8212; facets in search, site navigation, &#8230;</p>
<p>However, here is my question: Where did you find this &#8220;widely used&#8221; rule of thumb? I&#8217;ve looked all over and can&#8217;t find the source (or other users of this rule). </p>
<p>Thanks! -Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/08/13/taxonomies-good-bad-or-ugly/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 01:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/08/13/taxonomies-good-bad-or-ugly/#comment-275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never had experience with folksonomy directly outside of simple ones like WordPress.  The only problem I&#039;ve ever had with similar approaches is getting all of the users to apply the appropriate tags.  Just a few meta data tags has proven challenging at times, depending on the user community.

However, I can see its value for more of a KM type system.  That would be a pretty good approach if the users were committed to making it work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never had experience with folksonomy directly outside of simple ones like WordPress.  The only problem I&#8217;ve ever had with similar approaches is getting all of the users to apply the appropriate tags.  Just a few meta data tags has proven challenging at times, depending on the user community.</p>
<p>However, I can see its value for more of a KM type system.  That would be a pretty good approach if the users were committed to making it work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremi</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/08/13/taxonomies-good-bad-or-ugly/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeremi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/08/13/taxonomies-good-bad-or-ugly/#comment-265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,
What do you think about folksonomy?
It&#039;s another way to organize data. User can collaborate tagging document for them or the community. The sum of users will help organizing the content of the company.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
What do you think about folksonomy?<br />
It&#8217;s another way to organize data. User can collaborate tagging document for them or the community. The sum of users will help organizing the content of the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

