<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Little, Two Little, Three Little Interfaces</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordofpie.com/2007/07/25/one-little-two-little-three-little-interfaces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/07/25/one-little-two-little-three-little-interfaces/</link>
	<description>Ponderings on Life, the Universe, and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:39:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/07/25/one-little-two-little-three-little-interfaces/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/07/25/one-little-two-little-three-little-interfaces/#comment-192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edgier is an interesting choice of words. How about instead asking for more transparency. For example, if Bex comments that ECM systems should store content and not users then Craig Randall could respond by first saying that he agrees with this position and/or counter as to why Bex is wrong.

Craig could also state how much time he spends thinking about gaps in terms of ECM security (if any) and most importantly his thoughts on areas within the world of ECM where vendors really should work together to create standards.

Politicians respond but never really answer the question asked...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edgier is an interesting choice of words. How about instead asking for more transparency. For example, if Bex comments that ECM systems should store content and not users then Craig Randall could respond by first saying that he agrees with this position and/or counter as to why Bex is wrong.</p>
<p>Craig could also state how much time he spends thinking about gaps in terms of ECM security (if any) and most importantly his thoughts on areas within the world of ECM where vendors really should work together to create standards.</p>
<p>Politicians respond but never really answer the question asked&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Randall</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/07/25/one-little-two-little-three-little-interfaces/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 05:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/07/25/one-little-two-little-three-little-interfaces/#comment-137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve followed up (on eRoom/TaskSpace) &lt;a href=&quot;http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/07/not-running-for-office/#comment-20238&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve followed up (on eRoom/TaskSpace) <a href="http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/07/not-running-for-office/#comment-20238" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/07/25/one-little-two-little-three-little-interfaces/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/07/25/one-little-two-little-three-little-interfaces/#comment-122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig, I liked your entry, and most most entries in general.  When I read his comment, I had to look twice.  There wasn&#039;t too much value to be gained due to the very topic, but I didn&#039;t see it as political.  This is something that most IT people understand more and more over time.  I understand it and I&#039;m sure you reached others that I missed.

James suspect just wants something edgier from the vendor blogs.  He is, after all, &quot;From Incite comes Insight&quot;.  Maybe you should challenge James on what two sides of the discussion you seem to be straddling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, I liked your entry, and most most entries in general.  When I read his comment, I had to look twice.  There wasn&#8217;t too much value to be gained due to the very topic, but I didn&#8217;t see it as political.  This is something that most IT people understand more and more over time.  I understand it and I&#8217;m sure you reached others that I missed.</p>
<p>James suspect just wants something edgier from the vendor blogs.  He is, after all, &#8220;From Incite comes Insight&#8221;.  Maybe you should challenge James on what two sides of the discussion you seem to be straddling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Randall</title>
		<link>http://wordofpie.com/2007/07/25/one-little-two-little-three-little-interfaces/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordofpie.wordpress.com/2007/07/25/one-little-two-little-three-little-interfaces/#comment-121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Laurence. Given that &lt;a title=&quot;Links for 2007-07-27&quot; href=&quot;http://duckdown.blogspot.com/2007/07/links-for-2007-07-27.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;James thinks&lt;/a&gt; I should be a politician, I&#039;m curious if I &quot;said&quot; anything to you: &lt;a title=&quot;Presentation has its price&quot; href=&quot;http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/07/presentation-has-its-price/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Presentation has its price&lt;/a&gt;. If you didn&#039;t receive any value, then perhaps I need to reply again. Thanks in advance. -Craig]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Laurence. Given that <a title="Links for 2007-07-27" href="http://duckdown.blogspot.com/2007/07/links-for-2007-07-27.html" rel="nofollow">James thinks</a> I should be a politician, I&#8217;m curious if I &#8220;said&#8221; anything to you: <a title="Presentation has its price" href="http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/07/presentation-has-its-price/" rel="nofollow">Presentation has its price</a>. If you didn&#8217;t receive any value, then perhaps I need to reply again. Thanks in advance. -Craig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

